BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Relevance of PGP?

Subject: Relevance of PGP?
From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:01:55 -0400
In-reply-to: <4DF262F0.9040200-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ@public.gmane.org>
References: <BANLkTi=rH1vLCPpgO+cjCrt21XAsuUfe5Q@mail.gmail.com> <000401cc2767$b41595d0$1c40c170$@nedharvey.com> <4DF249DF.1040002@vl.com> <4DF24EE6.8030801@mohawksoft.com> <1B71198A-5203-4139-AED9-41650010C10D@gmail.com> <4DF262F0.9040200@mohawksoft.com>

On Jun 10, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:
> 
> I think you truncated my message before I actually describe something similar to this sort of service. Also, this is only one of my scenarios. There is another scenario where two entities wish to communicate privately. There needs to be a mechanism that allows people to exchange keys under separate cover secretly.

I don't see that as necessary when a strong, reliable verification mechanism exists.

--Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] Relevance of PGP?
  - From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org (Edward Ned Harvey)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org (Mark Woodward)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: richard.pieri-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org (Richard Pieri)
- Relevance of PGP?
  - From: markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org (Mark Woodward)

Prev by Date: Relevance of PGP?
Next by Date: Relevance of PGP?
Previous by thread: Relevance of PGP?
Next by thread: Relevance of PGP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org