Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/27/2011 9:53 AM, Rich Pieri wrote: > On 8/26/2011 11:40 PM, jk_xtblug at kinz.org wrote: >> Thats true for you and I and this community, but the legal community >> and the medical community still rely on faxes for "security". >> (Or something.... ) > > My understanding -- and this is incomplete information -- is that it > falls down to the legal signature. A photocopy or facsimile of a > document with a legal signature is considered to be a legal document for > record keeping purposes. A digital-only scan of that document is not. > This is a legal distinction, not a technical one. And an absurd one in an age when a lot of faxes are sent from computers. A fax is actually easier to forge than a digital document because of its relatively low resolution; it's trivial to pass off a Photoshopped document as an original fax scan. Yet another case of the law not keeping up with technical reality.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |