Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/27/2011 11:44 AM, Shirley M?rquez D?lcey wrote: > And an absurd one in an age when a lot of faxes are sent from computers. > A fax is actually easier to forge than a digital document because of its > relatively low resolution; it's trivial to pass off a Photoshopped > document as an original fax scan. Yet another case of the law not > keeping up with technical reality. It isn't about forgery. It's about what is and is not legally binding. Today, if a person other than the signatory or his authorized agent is involved directly in the reproduction of a document then the legal validity of the reproduction is questionable. In circumstances where it matters, such as court and medical and financial documents, documents of questionable validity are unacceptable. For example, the Apple Board of Directors recently elected Steve Jobs to the position of Chairman. If the documents are of questionable validity then someone could legitimately claim that The Steve is not legally the Chairman. The required procedures have not been followed. So, it isn't so much as the law failing to keep up as it is that legal proceedings don't change quickly. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |