Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Boy.. do I feel stupid. I had no idea drop box was basically a repository on steroids. I thought drop box was a service where I could upload a 20 gigabyte file and send a URL with a password to a friend so that he could down load that 20G file, thus working around large file limits in e-mail attachments. I run a subversion server on my home system which suffices for me to deal with keeping key files in a network accessible repository. Any time I hear the word cloud, I cringe... What happened to "The Grid"? So, let me refraise my question, is there any open source packages which would allow me to upload a file to a web site (my web site) and have it password protected and I could then e-mail the URL and password to my friend. I can do this all by hand, with .htaccess files etc, but I would prefer a nice web service to do it. thanks, and sorry for the confusion on my side... On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:09 -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > > From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss- > > bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Adler > > > > I'm getting a bit confused. I thought drop box was a service where one > > could upload a file, give it a password of some sort, and then you sent > > the password to someone else who could use it to grab the file. > > typically needed for large files, (multi-gigabyte) which cannot be > > e-mailed directly. After some time, the file gets deleted automatically. > > Does this drop box like systems mentioned use repository in the back > > end? I would assume it would just dump the file in some directory. > > Hey - Weren't you the guy whose OP said you wanted to build your own > dropbox? But it sounds like you don't really know what dropbox does... So > ... What is it you're trying to do? > > Here's a description of dropbox: > > You have a directory on your computer. It's automatically live synced to > some space in the cloud, which means all your file usage happens on local > disk, and everything's available both while you're online and offline. So > everything's fast and reliable, and you can use it while you're travelling. > Whenever there is a network connection available, it silently performs a > 2-way sync in the background. > > This has a few nice side effects... If you have more than one computer > connected to the same account, it means those computers are always in sync > with each other. You edit some file at work, you go home, and you continue > working. You can throw away your USB drive. It's faster and more reliable > than using a network file share across a WAN. There is no need to perform > any manual operations such as "svn commit" and so on. If your computer is > destroyed, you just join your account again, and it's all restored. So > people tend to use it for backup purposes too... > > You can share a folder with another user. So people use it for > collaboration. You and your sales force are working on some documents. You > edit something, and they get it instantly... And vice-versa. You're both > always up to date. > > Since it's all in the cloud, it's trivial for the servers to generate a URL > to access stuff. But by default there isn't any such URL, you have to > generate it intentionally. So if you right-click a file in your computer, > you go to Dropbox / Copy Public URL. And then it will give you a URL you > can email to someone else. Hence eliminating large attachments in email. > > It does versioning. It's compatible with windows & mac & linux & android & > iphone. You probably will install the client for convenience, but you don't > need to. You can do all your stuff via web interface if you want. > (Convenient when you're visiting somebody else's computer.) > > I think that's enough of a sales pitch for dropbox. ;-) > > There are various other competitors out there --- Box.net, sugarsync, > spideroak, and a few others. They all have some differentiators, but very > similar to each other functionally. > >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |