Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:55 AM, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >> >> Most of us have been in the business for some time now and know, wuite >> well, the does and don'ts of technology. As we all know, sometimes you >> do >> things that you think will "be ok." "It won't happen to me." etc. I set >> up >> the system with striping (RAID0) with no redundancy. > > And that's your own fault. You can't blame it on Hitachi. If you are saying that a catastrophic failure of a storage device does not reflect poorly upon the manufacturer, I suggest you rethink your position. If I were driving home in a Kia and it died with no symptoms, i.e. was running perfectly with no "check engine" light as well as properly maintained, would you NOT blame the manufacturer? I say that I had the drive for less than 2 years, it was lightly used. The drive died catastrophically. It had no trouble codes and there were no issues in the log. Sorry, yes, for my own sake, I should not have used RAID0, but I do take issue with the idea that a crap product does not reflect poorly on the company that produced it. I will assert that Hitachi drives are poor quality, I've had a 2 year 50% failure rate in my experience. I have had 4 Samsung drives in roughly equivalent conditions for a little longer and have had zero defects. I've had one, and only one, western digital disk die on me in two decades, and that was because it was in a USB enclosure that got knocked to the floor while it was on. Yes, RAID0 is not reliable, but I reject the idea that you can dismiss faulty product.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |