Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:45:45PM -0500, markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > I will assert that Hitachi drives are poor quality, I've had a 2 year 50% > failure rate in my experience. I have had 4 Samsung drives in roughly > equivalent conditions for a little longer and have had zero defects. I've > had one, and only one, western digital disk die on me in two decades, and > that was because it was in a USB enclosure that got knocked to the floor > while it was on. Even within a brand, there are spectacular differences between models of drives - and even between batches of the same model of drive. Take, for instance, the 65 Western Digital RE4 2TB enterprise drives (WD2002FYPS) I took in production about 2 years ago. So far I've got a failure rate approaching 30% - and most of those died after very light use. I've seen nothing like this with other WD models, and I've used quite a few over the years. Six months ago I installed 55 Hitachi 3TB drives (HDS5C3030ALA630). I have yet to see a single one of them fail. The backblaze guys also have great things to say about this model: http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/ Should I now conclude that all WD drives are completely unreliable and that all Hitachi drives are awesome? Of course not. I keep track of other people's experience with certain models of drives, but always take those accounts with a grain of salt - as someone else said in this thread, it is all anecdotal information. Most people do not have a sample size that is large enough to draw any meaningful conclusions from. And even when someone does have a large pool of installed drives, how would I know that the batch of drives I buy will be of the same quality as the one they have? So I select drives mostly based on length of warranty, accept that drive failures are a fact of life, and RMA drives when necessary. And I avoid using anything more fancy than RAID 1 - it's too easy to get burned by failing drives otherwise. Thanks, Ward. -- Pong.be -( "If you think penguins are fat and waddle, you have )- Virtual hosting -( never been attacked by one running at you in excess of )- http://pong.be -( 100 MPH." -- Linus )- GnuPG public key: http://pgp.mit.edu
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |