Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I could have sworn I recently ranted about this. Well. There are several points: The failure to address egregious bugs and misfeatures. Example: Metacity window placement. Even when fixes are provided the developers refuse to incorporate them into the code base. Open Source projects should be better than this. Inconsistencies across applications using the same toolkit. Example: if you move Gnome's main panel to the side of the screen then mot things rotate to fit except the task list which continues to display window names horizontally. Disregard for usability. KDE keeps piling more and more options into the UI; Gnome keeps throwing them away. Ubuntu spites everyone by putting a smartphone UI on the desktop -- and refuses to let anyone move the UI bar to the other side of the screen. LXDE's task bar is fixed at the bottom, which is a terrible place for it on wide aspect screens. All done with no consideration for usability. It's all about image and branding and market share, and perhaps controversy -- I haven't ruled that out of the reasons for Gnome 3. Nobody cares about usability except for the FreeDesktop folks, who have no authority, and Microsoft, which now employs UI specialists to fix and improve Microsoft's Windows and Application UIs. So, there you have it. Consistency and usability. Today, right now, Windows 7 delivers these better than everyone else. Including Apple. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |