Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have read a lot of the responses to a software engineering union. I have to say I'm pretty discouraged at the attitudes. Like I began, no organization of humans is without fault. Unions can be no different, obviously. That being said, I believe there is a HUGE big picture here that is missed. Statistically and historically, as unions flourish so do industries. Is this a cause and effect relationship? That is certainly up for debate. The state of software engineering is kind of sad as well. If you remember the 1980s, you'll remember a time when the work was far more rewarding. If not a union, maybe a guild, or some organization. We need to take control, as a group, and define our role as professionals. We need to push back on NDAs and non-competes and take them out of the hands of employers and put them into the hands of a negotiating body such that they are fair and do not expose members of our profession to risks. I did take some business law in school, but few engineers I've met really understand how to read a contract. A "union" or some other organization, with enough clout, could help this. Intellectual property, we should have some rights to the work we create. Just recently, song writers got their copyrights back from the record companies. Software engineers create a lot of intellectual property, copyrighted material and patents, we are paid very little for these compared to what they are worth. We should look at that. Lobby government, etc I understand there is fear of "unions," but remember most of that is FUD from industrialists and venture capitalists like Mitt Romney and his ilk. They have no vested interest in working conditions or jobs. If we don't take the reins of our profession, the MBAs will and are. I also believe that, counter to the FUD, when you have an involved work force protecting its workers, the balance of power creates more wealth. It may be debatable, and there can certainly be opinions on both sides, but there is more historical evidence that as the percentage of the work force that is unionized decreases, poverty increases and the economy shrinks. Conversely, as unionization increases, poverty decreases and the economy grows.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |