[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
On 7/25/2012 6:44 AM, Mark Woodward wrote:
> Its a brilliant move and it may work. I hope not, but it may.
Won't happen. Lots of reasons why. IBM is probably the largest.
--
Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: guy1gold at gmail.com (Guy Gold)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (Mark Woodward)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: jim at gasek.net (Jim Gasek)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Oracle Linux, going after CentOs
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (Mark Woodward)
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |
Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org