Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 04:46:40PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote: > On 08/03/2012 01:45 PM, Doug wrote: > > I know that the GPL does not mean the software can > >be used for free Actually, while you may collect a fee for distributing your software to your customers, the unmodified GPL does mean exactly that the software can be used AND redistrubuted, for free: Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the Program (independent of having been made by running the Program). Whether that is true depends on what the Program does. 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you conspicuously and appropriately publish on each copy an appropriate copyright notice and disclaimer of warranty; keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty; and give any other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the Program. Later paragraphs have similar language for executable code. The next paragraph is where you (or your liscencee, or anyone in posession of the code and accompanying GPL license) can get some money: You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy, and you may at your option offer warranty protection in exchange for a fee. But, the person you've sold the software to under the GPL is still governed by the agreement, in which you explicitly gave them the right to give the code to anyone they want, and as the first paragraph I quoted says, RUNNING the program is not restricted by the GPL whatsoever, and therefore anyone in posession of the code may compile it and use it for free. Moreover, they can give it away to anyone they want, under the same terms. That is what the GPL is for. Also note that THEY can collect money for distributing your software, but this in no way entitles you to receive money from them for doing so. If you're trying to profit from your software project, and preventing people from using your software without paying you is a concern of yours, the GPL is probably not what you want. The GPL was created to solve a very different problem, sort of the antithesis of this one. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |