Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:36:07 -0500 Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> wrote: > I know it had its detractors (including me), but I think that IBM's > SMIT for AIX had a good idea. SMIT's issues aren't so much SMIT's issues as they are AIX's issues. AIX has a big iron mainframe philosophy to it that doesn't make much sense to the general Unix world. It's internally consistent which makes AIX much nicer to administer than other UNIXes and Unixalikes if you can wrap your brane around that mainframe design. If you can't (or won't) accept AIX's different way of doing things then it'll be a bear to manage. IRIX is on the other side of it. Not only does IRIX go out of its way to hide the command line, many sysadminly tasks cannot be performed from the command line. SGI never implemented command line tools for those tasks (some of the disk management tools are what I recall from IRIX but there were others). I really didn't like working on SGI kit. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |