Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM, joe at polcari.com <joe at polcari.com> wrote: >> The problem I have with GUI administration is if you make a mistake, you never quite know what file got configured incorrectly, then you end up troubleshooting the GUI to find out what to fix. 10 points for open-source. But if you know what you're doing in the first place, it's nice to click once and get it done. > > I know it had its detractors (including me), but I think that IBM's > SMIT for AIX had a good idea. Put a "gui/text-based" wrapper around > the command line tools/config files and then show the user of the GUIs are nice for once a year tasks, but hell on repeated setups, so it is good to have both. The problem I see with providing both is that often the GUI writes over the text file, which disables the command-line/programmable interface. daniel feenberg NBER
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |