Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 01/24/2013 03:19 PM, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Bill Bogstad wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:14 PM, joe at polcari.com <joe at polcari.com> >> wrote: >>> The problem I have with GUI administration is if you make a >>> mistake, you never quite know what file got configured incorrectly, >>> then you end up troubleshooting the GUI to find out what to fix. 10 >>> points for open-source. But if you know what you're doing in the >>> first place, it's nice to click once and get it done. >> >> I know it had its detractors (including me), but I think that IBM's >> SMIT for AIX had a good idea. Put a "gui/text-based" wrapper around >> the command line tools/config files and then show the user of the > > GUIs are nice for once a year tasks, but hell on repeated setups, so > it is good to have both. The problem I see with providing both is that > often the GUI writes over the text file, which disables the > command-line/programmable interfac For most tasks I generally use the command line, but I found that for some tasks using the GUI (in this case the RHEL GUIs) saves some time. Mostly I prefer to use chkconfig over the Services GUI, but sometimes if I am coming in via the vSphere console, the GUI might be easier. 90% of the time I use YUM for updates and software installs, but on Debian based systems I'm not all that up on apt-get options. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |