| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> writes:
> Which as of the 1995 version 3 RFC, clearly defines LINK and SYMLINK
> protocol commands. Unfortunately, it also documents that some
> servers might not support LINK or even SYMLINK and introduces a FSINFO
> command that a client can use to determine ahead of time if a server
> supports these or other features. So the real answer is "it depends"
> on your local implementation. See
Yes, well, there's always room for that :)
I still have un-fond memories of a certain platform whose
implementation of nfsv3 mknod() was panic().