Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Bill Bogstad <bogstad at pobox.com> writes: > Which as of the 1995 version 3 RFC, clearly defines LINK and SYMLINK > protocol commands. Unfortunately, it also documents that some > servers might not support LINK or even SYMLINK and introduces a FSINFO > command that a client can use to determine ahead of time if a server > supports these or other features. So the real answer is "it depends" > on your local implementation. See Yes, well, there's always room for that :) I still have un-fond memories of a certain platform whose implementation of nfsv3 mknod() was panic().
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |