Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Daniel Hagerty <hag at linnaean.org> wrote: > "Edward Ned Harvey (blu)" <blu at nedharvey.com> writes: >.... > where this is the NFSv2 spec ("#define NFS_VERSION 2" in a nearby > header). The rest of the spec hints further that these do what you > think. If still in doubt, NFS is rfc defined. Which as of the 1995 version 3 RFC, clearly defines LINK and SYMLINK protocol commands. Unfortunately, it also documents that some servers might not support LINK or even SYMLINK and introduces a FSINFO command that a client can use to determine ahead of time if a server supports these or other features. So the real answer is "it depends" on your local implementation. See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1813.txt for details. Bill Bogstad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |