Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 04/23/2013 12:39 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 4/23/2013 7:32 AM, Jerry Feldman wrote: >> 2 years ago we set up our local build environment around git. But, we >> use SVN for a code repository for 2 of our products because (1) we are >> not allowed to use git and (2) the software is written by a third party >> in the Netherlands who uses SVN. > Which means you're stuck using and maintaining two different, > incompatible build systems. This is PRECISELY what I'm on about. If you > lack the authority to bring everyone on board then this is what will > happen. Whether or not you still have a job afterwards depends on who it > is the refuses to go along. > In our case in Boston, the SVN repositories are for 2 specific products that are essentially maintained by a third party developer. It is located on a single machine. The git repositories are for the stuff we do here in the office. If I were to have a vote, I would dump SVN, but the intent is to have the SVN repository to essentially be a mirror of the one in Europe. I don't manage the SVN repository. In Toronto they have both SVN and CVS repositories for some rather large projects. I don't know what their plans are, but I hope it is not ClearCase. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id:3BC1EB90 PGP Key fingerprint: 49E2 C52A FC5A A31F 8D66 C0AF 7CEA 30FC 3BC1 EB90
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |