Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Daniel Barrett wrote: > I found a similar no-set-top-box plan on FIOS for even less money, > $10/month, switched, and never had a problem again. You're referring to a plan that only covers the retransmission of local broadcast stations (and probably public access stations), right? Are you using it with digital or analog tuners? At one time, and perhaps still currently, FIOS optical network terminals (ONTs) actually provided the basic channels as analog video. Something Comcast got rid of years ago. Given the architecture of Comcast's network, they had more incentive to do so, as it ate up shared bandwidth on their system. Now that the FCC has ruled that cable companies have no obligation to provide the basic tier as unencrypted digital, I wonder how long you'll be able to continue using this service without a converter box. (A converter box the FCC says you can be charged for, after 2 years.) The cable companies cited faster service and lower technician costs as the main reason why they wanted all signals encrypted so they could electronically alter your subscription level. A laughable claim, once you see what the ONTs are capable of. Comcast could install a box at the termination point at your house, which like an ONT spits out unencrypted analog and digital video for no-set-top-box service. But then they couldn't get away with charging you a per-TV rental fee for an ONT or upsell you on pay-per-view and other services that require a set-top-box. Showing once again that the FCC are either chumps, or are willingly doing what's most profitable for the industry they supposedly regulate, rather than in the best interest of the public. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |