![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/05/2013 07:36 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Randy Cole wrote: >> Without competition or dpu regulation, > > FiOS is regulated. It is regulated at the local level just like every > other cable TV service in the US. But not in the same way copper POTS was in some very important respects. First, access: Vz doesn't /have/ to provide third party access (so for example there will never be another Speakeasy, or 10-10-220 if you remember that). Second, while Comcast is the vocal leader on this, Vz is right behind them: they like to claim that since it's not a POTS line any more that the provisions of common-carrier status don't apply (Comcast has voiced this on a few occasions in testimony to the FCC; Verizon for it's part took the FCC to court about net neutrality last year, wherein they basically said the same thing Comcast said ("common-carrier doesn't apply to us anymore"): http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2012/balancing-interests-open-internet-verizon-challenges-fccs-net-neutrality-rules ). Matt
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |