Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Matthew Gillen wrote: > But not in the same way copper POTS was in some very important respects. > First, access: Vz doesn't /have/ to provide third party access (so for > example there will never be another Speakeasy, or 10-10-220 if you > remember that). Almost all of the old CLECs /failed/. The CLEC business model doesn't work. The ones that barely survived, like Speakeasy and Covad, merged and now run their own circuits to corporate customers. > Second, while Comcast is the vocal leader on this, Vz > is right behind them: they like to claim that since it's not a POTS line > any more that the provisions of common-carrier status don't apply FiOS is not a common carrier service. FiOS is not available to everyone equally. Neither is Xfinity. Any given city or town can decide not to permit Verizon to provide FiOS service, the same way that any given city or town can decide not to permit Comcast to provide service. Since any given cable TV provider's service is not common to everyone that service cannot have common carrier status. You can thank or blame the FCC for this one. It's a side effect of the deregulation acts that put control over who provides what in the hands of municipal cable advisory boards. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |