Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
In terms of the signal to noise ratio for the list, the noise just went up. It seems like you're putting off Chuck's contribution to the list and at the same time not offering the "various reasons" why some (unnamed) alternate virtualization scheme works better for you. I don't do systems administration on a daily basis. I'm vaguely familiar with the never-ending succession of technologies, consortiums, standards and products that might go under the name 'virtualization' [1]. I find it helpful to be given a list of related technologies, starting with a 'native' to free software hypervisor so as to be familiar with the system from the bare metal up. If there are advantages to using a particular hypervisor, or new developments that make solution X interesting, then that would be a good discussion for this list. Right? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_platform_virtual_machines Greg Rundlett On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com>wrote: > Chuck Anderson wrote: > > It seems many people haven't heard of the built-in native > > We've heard of it. We just don't care to use it for various reasons. > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |