Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Kent Borg wrote: > Maybe because I was young and impressionable during the early personal > computer era, it seems better to me to give users their own hardware > rather than servers...unless there is a real economy of scale that kicks > in for the server. Now that the PC era is coming to a close, this might What do you do for backups and long-term archives? How do you ensure that, for example, every user leaves their workstation turned on 24/7? Answer: you can't. This is an actual issue that I have with a group of users. Regardless of what they're told, regardless of labels attached to their workstations, they shut them off when they leave their offices. These workstations are never backed up because they can't be backed up. We could implement local backups for these users however, beyond a certain point this becomes more costly than a centralized system. Users' AFS home directories? Backed up nightly, all automatic except for swapping in new tapes every month. It costs nothing to add more users and workstations to the system since we haven't reached absolute capacity. I generally prefer AFS to NFS. It has a much better security model. It uses a local cache for improved performance. It has a robust snapshot and backup mechanism built in. Pretty much anything bad one can say about NFS is addressed in AFS. -- Rich P.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |