BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] linux on usb stick
- Subject: [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:01:52 -0500
- In-reply-to: <52F021FF.1010806@gmail.com>
- References: <52EEC358.5090301@stephenadler.com> <52EEE948.1060204@gmail.com> <52F0183A.1090504@stephenadler.com> <52F021FF.1010806@gmail.com>
Tom Metro wrote: > VMware caching I/O wouldn't really explain it, if the underlying file > system is still on a Flash device, which in Stephen's scenario it was. When running natively, reads and writes are going to queue up behind fsync() calls and programs will block. It's unavoidable because flash has terrible write performance. When running in a VM the VM system acknowledges fsync() calls and returns an "okay" status without actually performing the sync to disk. The virtualized guest will not block until the host blocks. A result of this is that you can get performance that appears to exceed the physical capabilities of the underlying device. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- References:
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Date Change: BLU Desktop GNU/Linux SIG Meeting - Community Outreach Planning - Weds, Feb 5, 2014
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- Next by thread: [Discuss] linux on usb stick
- Index(es):