BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:26:21 -0700
Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > Hehhehe - No. The goal is mash the power button, with the results described > above, while using only 2 servers and free software. ;-) Well, if the free or low-cost software existed to make it work well, I'd eagerly pony up to pay the electric bill running a third server. My point is--there have been essentially no advances in the software to operate this, commercial /or/ free, during the 2000s by anyone other than the paid staff at companies like AWS, Google, and Microsoft. Even VMware's solution is about a decade old by now, and its customers (like my employer) are fleeing en masse from private VMware clusters to AWS despite the steep price. -rich
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: feenberg at nber.org (Daniel Feenberg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):