BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:04:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <2663dc0e1987e86227f146d8aca7b4ac.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <2663dc0e1987e86227f146d8aca7b4ac.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
Rich Braun wrote: > Well, if the free or low-cost software existed to make it work well, I'd > eagerly pony up to pay the electric bill running a third server. You mean like Red Hat Cluster Suite and Pacemaker? You don't see advancement in HA clustering because we reached the pinnacle over 30 years ago. It's a well-understood problem with literally decades of history backing up a handful of best practices. Anything new is just a specific implementation of these practices. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):