BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:16:21 -0400
- In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1403311201460.12920@sas1.nber.org>
- References: <2663dc0e1987e86227f146d8aca7b4ac.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <alpine.LRH.2.11.1403311201460.12920@sas1.nber.org>
Daniel Feenberg wrote: > would be pretty straightforward. I don't know why client-side HA > features have never shown up in standards since DNS was defined, but > they haven't. Because at the time DNS became a standard a typical "client" was something like a VT-100 or DECserver wired to the highly available system. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: feenberg at nber.org (Daniel Feenberg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):