BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:56:08 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53399727.2050600@gmail.com>
- References: <6632cf71d55dabb34806494b44349729.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <533884C8.4050006@gmail.com> <53388C0C.5060309@borg.org> <533891E9.8030600@gmail.com> <53389A03.8010707@borg.org> <5338A93F.4090907@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3WUgbBwWww3THHjJorMTusjzesK77koaPUCoVXEYRZNvA@mail.gmail.com> <533983C6.2010307@gmail.com> <97c2d58b043cec45a810ac0fc51c84c2.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <533990FF.8020502@gmail.com> <234c216c2909382f930971465da5a793.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53399727.2050600@gmail.com>
> markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: >> OK, that's a pretty stupid thing to do. Who would do that? That's the > > DRDB does precisely this. That will teach me to come in mid-thread. Yes, I have looked at that before. That isn't a backup, per se' that's a HA fail-over mechanism. In the case of "A" being corrupted, "B" must also be corrupted identically for DRDB to be feature compliant.
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):