BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:26:15 -0400
- In-reply-to: <234c216c2909382f930971465da5a793.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
- References: <6632cf71d55dabb34806494b44349729.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <533884C8.4050006@gmail.com> <53388C0C.5060309@borg.org> <533891E9.8030600@gmail.com> <53389A03.8010707@borg.org> <5338A93F.4090907@gmail.com> <CAAbKA3WUgbBwWww3THHjJorMTusjzesK77koaPUCoVXEYRZNvA@mail.gmail.com> <533983C6.2010307@gmail.com> <97c2d58b043cec45a810ac0fc51c84c2.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <533990FF.8020502@gmail.com> <234c216c2909382f930971465da5a793.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com>
markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > OK, that's a pretty stupid thing to do. Who would do that? That's the DRDB does precisely this. > worse of both worlds. Not only are you backing up EVERY block, you aren't > even preserving old data. Hell you aren't even excluding uninitialized > disk blocks. So, even if you only have 500G on a 2TB drive used, you have > to copy 2TB each time. No. You should read up on DRBD because it's not what you think it is, nor does it work the way you think it does. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):