BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Subject: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 12:23:08 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CA+h9Qs7tqd1eTEXS778S6danh3d1SSB05AViZGCGUpq_FfZjWA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <2663dc0e1987e86227f146d8aca7b4ac.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <53399201.7010207@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs7tqd1eTEXS778S6danh3d1SSB05AViZGCGUpq_FfZjWA@mail.gmail.com>
John Abreau wrote: > I believe you missed Rich's point. He's not talking about advances in > solving the problem, he's talking about advances in making it easier and > less expensive to deploy the solution. We reached the point of least cost and least effort several decades ago. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Redundant array of inexpensive servers: clustering?
- Index(es):
