BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 17:25:29 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5367EB97.5070501@gmail.com>
- References: <5364F3FB.40707@blu.org> <5367AE30.5020205@borg.org> <5367B2A9.3090804@gmail.com> <5367E6E2.7050005@borg.org> <5367EB97.5070501@gmail.com>
On 05/05/2014 03:50 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Repeat after me: redundant disks do not provide data integrity. No, you are not my kindergarten teacher. And "data integrity" isn't as narrow and simple a definition as you pretend. > Redundant disks -- be they rotating platters or flash chips -- will > keep the system running if one fails but they won't protect your data > from corruption or loss. Depends on what I mean by "corruption or loss". Scenario 1: Horrible noise comes from one disk and it quits working. Desire: Go back in time to just before the horrible noise. Solution: RAID works great, in fact you are already forward of point and still running. (Order a new disk.) Scenario 2: Horrible bug scribbles all over your data. Desire: Go back to before the scribble. Solution: Pull out your recovery plan (you have one, of course) and start the recovery process. The two cases are different. To backup your data you need to understand why you have your data and what could go wrong with it. And to think through how you can prepare in advance. If hypothetical someone thinks that RAID handles case #2, then that person is not a good person to think through the problem. When you repeat slogans about what RAID can't do, I think you are talking to that same hypothetical person. I don't think that hypothetical person is here. -kb
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Is Sharp AL-1540CS a paperweight on Linux
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):