BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Subject: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:25:24 +0000
- In-reply-to: <5367DEF1.7030206@arlsoft.com>
- References: <5364F3FB.40707@blu.org> <5367AE30.5020205@borg.org> <5367B2A9.3090804@gmail.com> <5367DEF1.7030206@arlsoft.com>
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org [mailto:discuss- > bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On Behalf Of MBR > > While it's true that any medium can fail with no warning, if your data's > on a spinning magnetic platter, the most likely modes of failure do not > destroy all the data on the platter. If your data is valuable enough to send to a recovery center for $1,000, then it's valuable enough to add a mirror for $100. Go crazy and make it a 3-way mirror. $200 There's never a situation where the drive recovery option is a good choice. All such failures could have been prevented for a fraction of the cost via redundancy and/or backups.
- References:
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- From: mbr at arlsoft.com (MBR)
- [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SSD drives vs. Mechanical drives
- Index(es):