[Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance

[ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)]

On 05/14/2014 10:39 AM, Richard Pieri wrote:
> F. O. Ozbek wrote:
>> We have tested moosefs extensively. The commercial version has
>> redundant metadata servers and redundant chunk servers.
>> Ignoring fsync is not a problem. We will use in production
>> for real data. (not scratch.)
>
> Um. Yeah. Good luck with that. I think you'll need it. Because all the
> redundancy in the world does you no good if the data doesn't get written
> in the first place.
>

The data gets written. We have tested it.
I don't need the luck, Thank you very much.