BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Subject: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:10:25 -0400
- In-reply-to: <e2d144397125b9340bda1ef334a92ba0.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
- References: <e2d144397125b9340bda1ef334a92ba0.squirrel@webmail.ci.net>
On 05/10/2014 04:00 PM, Rich Braun wrote: > Googling for performance-tuning on glusterFS makes me shake my head, > ultimately the technology is half-baked if it takes 500ms or more just to > transfer an inode from a source path into a glusterFS volume. I should be > able to "cp -a" or rsync any directory on my system, whether it's got 100 > files or 1 million files, into a gluster volume without waiting for hours or > days. It falls apart completely after about 10,000 files, which means I can > only use the technology for a small portion of my deployments. That said, if > any of y'all are *actually using* glusterfs for *anything* I'd love to share > stories. > > -rich > Yes, we are using moosefs, if you want to learn about it you can contact me off the list. I can give you detailed info about our tests, our environment, show our hardware, etc, etc. The list unfortunately is not a good medium to discuss, the discussion quickly deteriorates. Thanks Fevzi
- References:
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Next by thread: [Discuss] OT: Cambridge seeks applicants for broadband task force
- Index(es):