BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Subject: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 10:15:49 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=p1MRpnFRWPvqd=4YAXf-f+Qq=HUcNEBza6dRLey=-zkQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <e2d144397125b9340bda1ef334a92ba0.squirrel@webmail.ci.net> <537368BC.9040801@gmx.com> <5373789E.1060700@gmail.com> <53737BC5.4020700@gmx.com> <53738013.8000500@gmail.com> <53738216.6060508@gmx.com> <53738816.6020505@gmail.com> <53738ADA.2040006@gmx.com> <CAJFsZ=oDUPGvuC8Zd5a_okBg8pmPNQ-FndBsGLZKeNwDy9OAhg@mail.gmail.com> <5373D664.40105@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=p1MRpnFRWPvqd=4YAXf-f+Qq=HUcNEBza6dRLey=-zkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Bill Bogstad wrote: > I wasn't saying that POSIX doesn't require fsync() to force data to > disk. I was saying that POSIX says nothing about if ANY data has to > actually be saved to stable storage if fsync()/close() has NOT been called. Mea culpa. I misunderstood your point. You are correct: POSIX says nothing about what to do with data if fsync() and close() aren't called. The programmers' assumption likely derives from the sync or flush daemon which historically calls sync() every 30 seconds. Reliance on the sync daemon is fine on traditional, POSIX compliant file systems with honest hardware and assuming that durability isn't a priority. Not so much on cluster file systems that use their own flush mechanisms to keep writes ordered properly. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richb at pioneer.ci.net (Rich Braun)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Gluster startup, small-files performance
- Index(es):