BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- Subject: [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:56:08 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53919F52.5040106@blu.org>
- References: <1401974752.2680.YahooMailNeo@web122601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAOTD2YQMUiRs3FSRQr6U8TUJJ6-huHRHY=OLP9tSgcgiD7D8cQ@mail.gmail.com> <53919F52.5040106@blu.org>
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote: > Actually triangulation is used in GPS also. It is a very old tried and > true method. Very true. Some difference are: 1. GPS is triangulation from satellites rather then cell towers 2. GPS was designed explicitly to provide location information and is available anywhere the sky is sufficiently visible. 3. GPS triangulation is done in the endpoint while the cell tower one is done cooperatively by the cell network as a whole. 4. GPS can be done passively by anyone anywhere, while cell tower triangulation requires endpoints that transmit (and as a result identify themselves.) I think that #4 is particularly interesting. I had a recent discussion with my father-in-law about Google's driverless cars and he was concerned that this meant that people would be trackable via their vehicle. He didn't seem to realize that it was perfectly possible to do driverless cars with GPS and offline maps in a way that was untrackable. Of course, I pointed out that we all now carry personal tracking devices (cellphones) anyway so there is no need to track our cars. Bill Bogstad Note to #4: I could conceive of a system that worked via network triangulation where the endpoint broadcast a random token which was used by the cell towers to triangulate the anonymous endpoint. I'm pretty sure that isn't the way it is done and even if it was the network would still know SOME device was at a particular location. It's interesting to note that because GPS was intended for dual civilian/military use, it was a design requirement that silent endpoints could determine their location. Privacy (of location) was obviously mandatory for military users.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- References:
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- From: oliverholmes369 at yahoo.com (Oliver Holmes)
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond
- Next by Date: [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] GPS feature in cellphones?
- Index(es):