BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Subject: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:21:27 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=qChALKF2jJqmWTBwVUaPjjc8Tq-oU7+-pui1BreDeeHg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJFsZ=oqFAXiicbUBo1CyaWOCkqW62DK=+7NRGUyQpSdjoagqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPiok-p_jq=Ej2DwPCC2vRm2geJW27ma8-RmFGRMUu5KN-cTWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=qChALKF2jJqmWTBwVUaPjjc8Tq-oU7+-pui1BreDeeHg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/23/2014 2:02 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote: > The problem seems to be 100% bad filesystem software. No, it's FUSE. FUSE runs in user space. Disk I/O happens in kernel space. This means that read and write operations require much context switching. The overhead for this is very high. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- References:
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: johnhall2.0 at gmail.com (John Hall)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] what does this mean: usb 2-2: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
- Next by Date: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
- Index(es):
