BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?

Subject: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:55:07 -0400
In-reply-to: <53D01D7D.1060404@gmail.com>
References: <CAJFsZ=oqFAXiicbUBo1CyaWOCkqW62DK=+7NRGUyQpSdjoagqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPiok-p_jq=Ej2DwPCC2vRm2geJW27ma8-RmFGRMUu5KN-cTWw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=qChALKF2jJqmWTBwVUaPjjc8Tq-oU7+-pui1BreDeeHg@mail.gmail.com> <53CFFD27.8050408@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=rYNxxY35u+H77feJOO6HfB4_n6VusqgHhSwYbVhp9LPg@mail.gmail.com> <53D01D7D.1060404@gmail.com>

On 7/23/2014 4:39 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
> NTFS performance comes from caching.

I should amend that: NTFS performance comes in part from caching.

-- 
Rich P.

References:
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: johnhall2.0 at gmail.com (John Hall)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
  - From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)

Prev by Date: [Discuss] Https - the solution to net neutrality
Next by Date: [Discuss] Https - the solution to net neutrality
Previous by thread: [Discuss] any decent NTFS implementations for Linux?
Next by thread: [Discuss] business class ISP recommendations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.