BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] vnc
- Subject: [Discuss] vnc
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:47:50 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53FA4404.3000402@blu.org>
- References: <53F9F6B9.4060505@stephenadler.com> <20140824161132.GE14848@randomstring.org> <be314521ab6bebb6add54d706b042f01.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FA1C3B.70908@gmail.com> <53FA4404.3000402@blu.org>
On 8/24/2014 3:59 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: > our team has their own display number for VNC. I also tested vnc against > xming, and I found that VNC tended to have better performance. If you're comparing VNC to XDMCP then VNC will be better. VNC transmits only those areas of the framebuffer that change whereas XDMCP transmits the entire framebuffer. Addressing this inefficiency is one of the reasons why VNC was originally developed. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] vnc
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] vnc
- Next by Date: [Discuss] vnc
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] vnc
- Next by thread: [Discuss] vnc
- Index(es):
