BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] vnc
- Subject: [Discuss] vnc
- From: nuno at aeminium.org (Nuno Sucena Almeida)
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 07:11:33 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53FA1C3B.70908@gmail.com>
- References: <53F9F6B9.4060505@stephenadler.com> <20140824161132.GE14848@randomstring.org> <be314521ab6bebb6add54d706b042f01.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FA1C3B.70908@gmail.com>
On 08/24/2014 01:09 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Right tool for the job and all that. > > That said, I'd avoid using OpenVPN. I don't like X.509. I want X.509 to > die in a fire. I want it to die painfully and permanently and never > bother anyone ever again. For Linux to Linux I'd use Layer 3 tunneling > over SSH using sshuttle to handle the heavy lifting. I use sshuttle for a very particular situation, but the way it works, with a few hacks, looks much less cleaner than OpenVPN. I've been using OpenVPN for many years without trouble, either at Layer 2 or Layer 3, and the network configuration is much more clear than the magic that sshuttle does. Why the dislike of X.509 ? Coming back to the topic, if not using XDMCP, one can use x11vnc to direct to the login screen, by passing the auth parameter, something like this: sudo x11vnc -ncache 10 -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 The auth parameter argument can be found by looking at the running X: ps ax | fgrep -- -auth regards, Nuno -- http://aeminium.org/nuno/
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- References:
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] vnc
- Next by Date: [Discuss] vnc
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] vnc
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Index(es):