BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Subject: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 14:49:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <53FF75C6.7@gmail.com>
- References: <53F9F6B9.4060505@stephenadler.com> <20140824161132.GE14848@randomstring.org> <be314521ab6bebb6add54d706b042f01.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com> <53FA1C3B.70908@gmail.com> <53FB19E5.4080602@aeminium.org> <53FB4A5D.2030305@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5GnC6d1ejBQC=crtHwxoDiFWo4Kn+xjt0eiA8Kr733_A@mail.gmail.com> <53FB70E6.50706@gmail.com> <sjmmwarchcd.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <53FE1FCB.7010405@gmail.com> <sjmvbpcbji2.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <53FF75C6.7@gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Richard Pieri <richard.pieri at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't have their keys. I have one-way hashes of their keys. And your > hypothetical dump will have the same one-way hashes. which is far safer than one-way hashes of any usable passwords. Kerberos KDC is limits the attack surface instead of concentrating it, and implements session key negotiation without requiring asymmetric (PubKey), although public key is available for authentication. pretty slick. ( Don't think it would scale to the whole internet though, as we have other requirements there. ) -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- References:
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: markw at mohawksoft.com (markw at mohawksoft.com)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- From: nuno at aeminium.org (Nuno Sucena Almeida)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] vnc
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Why the dislike of X.509?
- Index(es):