BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Subject: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 22:14:39 -0400
http://www.infoworld.com/print/248950 Mike Gancarz sums up the Unix philosophy: 1. Small is beautiful. 2. Make each program do one thing well. ... We have built the Internet and all modern Internet services on those principles. Systemd's design and implementation violates nearly all of them. Should it be a surprise that so many long-term Unix and Linux developers, architects, and administrators recoil at the thought of something like systemd? It might seem that the design of systemd purposefully dispensed with the wisdom of 45 years of Unix development and struck out in a different direction just to spite the old guard. [...] Opinions? -Tom
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: dsr at randomstring.org (Dan Ritter)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- From: adler at stephenadler.com (Stephen Adler)
- [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Debian Commercial Support ?
- Next by Date: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Debian Commercial Support ?
- Next by thread: [Discuss] SysVinit vs. systemd
- Index(es):