BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- Subject: [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 19:54:07 -0400
- In-reply-to: <542C6AE6.6060503@blu.org>
- References: <542B63A8.50406@gmail.com> <542C1625.9000009@gmail.com> <CAJFsZ=oZh7Gzo69mTydO-SUNknZhqs06gQOH=h9naOiwCXfDRg@mail.gmail.com> <542C5D08.1080803@blu.org> <542C619C.9040903@gmail.com> <542C6AE6.6060503@blu.org>
On 10/1/2014 4:58 PM, Jerry Feldman wrote: > But, you are right on with that. Physical security is always the best > first option. But, for a regular person who essentially can't afford a > secure facility for his/her data, you've got to consider both encryption > and backing up to a secure backup location. I disagree on the point of encryption. There's a good solution out there if you just think outside the box. Or inside the box this time around: dog cages. A heavy duty, welded steel dog cage will run you $300-$500 depending on the size. Bolt the cage to the floor, put your server(s) in it, and lock it with a good padlock. Voila! your own secure data cage. -- Rich P.
- References:
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Server/laptop full-disk encryption
- Next by Date: [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- Next by thread: [Discuss] CipherShed: TrueCrypt fork
- Index(es):