BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] systemd revisited
- Subject: [Discuss] systemd revisited
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:43:07 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5445C975.3010901@gmail.com>
- References: <5445C975.3010901@gmail.com>
?I noted some Sysadmins and upstream developers (folks with a clear stake in the outcome but without DD voting credentials) have promised to Fork if Debian isn't kept usefully Init-neutral. http://debianfork.org/ Normally in voluntary orgs, giving votes to only those doing the work is a good thing -- that's how the (D)ARPAnet RFC process worked even before IETF was codified, and that's why it worked -- but in this particular case, the interests of the upstream & downstream Devs and frontline Sysadmins are being ignored. I don't know what the right answer is, but i know it's not one-size-fits-all. If systemd is effectively mandated in all mainstream distros, a fork for at least embedded use will be needed. -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- References:
- [Discuss] systemd revisited
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] systemd revisited
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] systemd revisited
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Cell phones and towers
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] systemd revisited
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Cell phones and towers
- Index(es):