BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Subject: [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- From: drew.vanzandt at gmail.com (Drew Van Zandt)
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:40:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5579F121.30500@gmail.com>
- References: <CAOTD2YTzvszWROcaW+6Nf6acX8_jR1DUWbpzQgwLt4mag9v_4g@mail.gmail.com> <5579F121.30500@gmail.com>
When I installed OpenVPN years ago, the Windows client Just Worked (once I fed it the cert). I probably still have the detailed install instructions I wrote back then, somewhere. Mostly to make 100% sure I did not have to repeat myself 50 times. *Drew Van ZandtArtisan's Asylum Board of DirectorsFirefly Arts Collective Board of Directors* On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Tom Metro <tmetro+blu at gmail.com> wrote: > Matt Shields wrote: > > Anyone using the Juniper SA series VPN's? > > We're working with a client that uses a Juniper VPN. (We hate > proprietary VPNs. What's worse is they have it configured to prevent > split networking.) > > We've found that there are per-user settings on the server side that > controls what sort of client you are fed (Java) or what sort of > connection it expects. With OS X you have a choice between the older > Network Connect client and the newer Junos Pulse, which you mentioned. > I'm pretty sure you can't arbitrarily switch between these on the client > side. The server settings have to be switched to match. > > Similarly, we're using OpenConnect as the client on Linux machines, and > before that would work our accounts needed to be switch to "Linux mode" > as the Windows admin called it. > > According to what I've read, OpenConnect will run on OS X, and gives you > a lot greater control over the connection (like the ability to force > split networking). However, to get Juniper functionality working you > really need to build the bleeding edge version of OpenConnect, and even > then might still need to apply a patch posted to the OpenConnect mailing > list. (We've been involved in a few threads on the list. I can send you > a link to the patch if you need it.) > > The funny thing about these proprietary VPNs is that they give the > perception of being easier to use for the non-techie Windows users, yet > then tend to be significantly time consuming to work with for power > users. Open source has taken over most fields. Why are VPNs still a > holdout? Is there not a super easy OpenVPN client for Windows yet? I > know there is commercial support for OpenVPN. > > -Tom > > -- > Tom Metro > The Perl Shop, Newton, MA, USA > "Predictable On-demand Perl Consulting." > http://www.theperlshop.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
- References:
- [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- From: matt at mattshields.org (Matt Shields)
- [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Juniper VPN's
- Index(es):