BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] memory management
- Subject: [Discuss] memory management
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:38:50 -0400
- In-reply-to: <55885E49.8040902@mattgillen.net>
- References: <558420D5.6090803@mattgillen.net> <55858DB0.4080709@mattgillen.net> <55885E49.8040902@mattgillen.net>
On 6/22/2015 3:13 PM, Matthew Gillen wrote: > What strikes me as odd and wrong is that the OS doesn't seem to protect > itself from thrashing. The system is perfectly happy to render itself > inoperative in the service of some lone process sucking up memory. Don't like swap thrashing? Shut off swap. There can be no swap trashing if there is no swap. Just don't whine when the OOM killer reaps the applications that you're using. -- Rich P.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- References:
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] memory management
- Next by Date: [Discuss] A laptop for Linux
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] memory management
- Next by thread: [Discuss] memory management
- Index(es):