BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] memory management
- Subject: [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:40:05 -0400
- In-reply-to: <5588644A.8010602@gmail.com>
- References: <558420D5.6090803@mattgillen.net> <55858DB0.4080709@mattgillen.net> <55885E49.8040902@mattgillen.net> <5588644A.8010602@gmail.com>
On 6/22/2015 3:38 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 6/22/2015 3:13 PM, Matthew Gillen wrote: >> What strikes me as odd and wrong is that the OS doesn't seem to protect >> itself from thrashing. The system is perfectly happy to render itself >> inoperative in the service of some lone process sucking up memory. > > Don't like swap thrashing? Shut off swap. There can be no swap trashing > if there is no swap. > > Just don't whine when the OOM killer reaps the applications that you're > using. That doesn't (necessarily) address the issue I was raising about an out of control app wreaking havoc on the rest of the system. Just a different flavor of havoc. Matt
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] memory management
- References:
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] memory management
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] memory management
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] inevitability of bad code (was Re: sandboxing web browsers)
- Next by Date: [Discuss] A laptop for Linux
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] memory management
- Next by thread: [Discuss] memory management
- Index(es):