BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] inevitability of bad code (was Re: sandboxing web browsers)
- Subject: [Discuss] inevitability of bad code (was Re: sandboxing web browsers)
- From: bill.n1vux at gmail.com (Bill Ricker)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:33:24 -0400
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:19 PM, John Abreau <jabr at blu.org> wrote: > I've seen plenty of piss-poor coding done in perl, > python, C, Fortran, and every other language I've ever reviewed. I don't think i ever saw piss-poor Ottawa Euclid, but the prerequisite maths (higher order logics) kept the user community pretty tight-knit and erudite. :-) [ And conversely, erudite exceptional 31337 haxors have done literate programming in macro-assembler, Lisp/Scheme, APL/J/K, FORTH/Postscript, ..., most elegantly. Happily i haven't read enough SNOBOL or BF to have an opinion whether such exceptions exist for all the "write only" languages, but such is true for all that ever mattered. ] -- Bill Ricker bill.n1vux at gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] A laptop for Linux
- Next by Date: [Discuss] memory management
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Firefox -> Icecat
- Next by thread: [Discuss] large log file transfer
- Index(es):