BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:04:46 +0000
- In-reply-to: <5598038F.9070408@gmail.com>
- References: <20150703203041.9CCE7E2035@mail2.ihtfp.org> <5598038F.9070408@gmail.com>
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On > Behalf Of Tom Metro > > I'm more interested in clever ways of using multiple, cheap, commodity > NAS boxes, Google-style. For example, for the same cost as that $600+ > (diskless) DIY NAS I linked to, I can get 4 of the QNAP 2-bay boxes and > maybe combine them with something like MooseFS. You get redundancy > where > some number of the boxes can go down, and it still keeps working, and > you can expand capacity by adding more boxes (if drive density increases > don't keep pace). I think the leaders in this space are glusterfs, and ceph. But I'm sure each one has their own individual strengths and weaknesses. Among them is compatibility - I don't think you're going to get anything like this to work with windows or mac clients, or have an android or ios app.
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: ozbek at gmx.com (F. O. Ozbek)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. buil
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: ZFS vs. BtrFS
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):