BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: jack at coats.org (Jack Coats)
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:13:29 -0500
- In-reply-to: <55A0006A.6090201@gmail.com>
- References: <20150703203041.9CCE7E2035@mail2.ihtfp.org> <5598038F.9070408@gmail.com> <sjm8uarevhe.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <559FED8A.9010407@borg.org> <559FF473.7010405@gmail.com> <559FFD2E.6090901@borg.org> <55A0006A.6090201@gmail.com>
Ok, a rookie question (but real) here. How do you know if your drive is near 'end of life'? Calendar? SMART statistics? Hours of runtime? I have been known to wait till the 'wheels fall off', but that always causes minor panics and excess effort. Suggestions that are easy to follow and quantifiable?
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):
