BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Subject: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:23:55 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAFq0N1wX6gdtrc7DUQBnAzHKFrS7LrP+AmiP7zb_w8UahBx58g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20150703203041.9CCE7E2035@mail2.ihtfp.org> <5598038F.9070408@gmail.com> <sjm8uarevhe.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <559FED8A.9010407@borg.org> <559FF473.7010405@gmail.com> <559FFD2E.6090901@borg.org> <55A0006A.6090201@gmail.com> <CAFq0N1wX6gdtrc7DUQBnAzHKFrS7LrP+AmiP7zb_w8UahBx58g@mail.gmail.com>
Google published a study a number of years ago, based on statistics they gathered of drive performance in their enormous collection of servers over many years. One of their conclusions was that hard drives tend to have a useful life of three years: the odds of catastrophic failure were very low for the first three years, and after that the odds start climbing. Based on the statistics they gathered, they recommended a policy of replacing drives every three years regardless of whether they're failing yet. The idea is that disks are cheap these days, and the cost of losing data far outweighs the cost of replacing drives before they fail. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jack Coats <jack at coats.org> wrote: > Ok, a rookie question (but real) here. How do you know if your drive is > near 'end of life'? Calendar? SMART statistics? Hours of runtime? > > I have been known to wait till the 'wheels fall off', but that always > causes minor panics and excess effort. > > Suggestions that are easy to follow and quantifiable? > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email: abreauj at gmail.com / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0x920063C6 PGP-Key-Fingerprint A5AD 6BE1 FEFE 8E4F 5C23 C2D0 E885 E17C 9200 63C6
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: smallm at SDF.ORG (Mike Small)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- References:
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: tmetro+blu at gmail.com (Tom Metro)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: warlord at MIT.EDU (Derek Atkins)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Richard Pieri)
- [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- From: jack at coats.org (Jack Coats)
- [Discuss] NAS: buy vs. build
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by Date: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Next by thread: [Discuss] NAS: lots of bays vs. lots of boxes
- Index(es):