BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Subject: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: mbr at arlsoft.com (MBR)
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:26:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAJFsZ=pipAFZT6JPoV7fktG_uLVGboV-dLBYRzEsTAu=u9r_Wg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <v1q09cqnmfpg4saensypmrdq.1443230831986@email.android.com> <20150930202212.GH6060@dragontoe.org> <20151001134358.GL30195@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <560D4CD9.60008@gmail.com> <CADdM39zicf7=LA5Q27iX3JXnXFdtaLiCUupW_U-qmdTmE0YK4g@mail.gmail.com> <560D4EB3.7060803@gmail.com> <CADdM39zG39-AEoc8raZcH+HhAtJnaTzBX_ZWzmVXuVx=8rxUPg@mail.gmail.com> <560D5220.6080305@gmail.com> <CAFv2jcZAzQbTSDSKq7J6LWDaCkbjnkyvsqcrzMrb3XAGsE7-2g@mail.gmail.com> <560D6491.9070804@gmail.com> <CA+h9Qs5roAn7EE_FT90fBoo9UL4MQES0Mud40atTw9NoOuLNkw@mail.gmail.com> <560D69EA.2040700@gmail.com> <560D76BB.9080704@mattgillen.net> <560D9050.3050906@gmail.com> <201510020110.t921Anlu021166@dsl092-065-009.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net> <560DEBE2.5040206@gmail.com> <CAMdng5v3BvxyJPcLDCd779Vp4uKPbsew3KphXQ_qv4Cisb-Vmg@mail.gmail.com> <BLUPR04MB36919E0DC8B62C151D03341DC480@BLUPR04MB369.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAJFsZ=pipAFZT6JPoV7fktG_uLVGboV-dLBYRzEsTAu=u9r_Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Unfortunately, Torvalds despises GPLv3, so the Linux kernel and anything else he has copyright on will stay with GPLv2. Mark Rosenthal On 10/5/15 1:33 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) > <blu at nedharvey.com> wrote: >>> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey.com at blu.org] On >>> Behalf Of Shirley M?rquez D?lcey >>> >>> A router locked down in that way could not incorporate any GPLv3 code. >> I don't see any reason locked-down firmware would violate GPLv3. As long as you announce what code you're using, and distribute the code. > Actually one of the changes in GPLv3 was to add requirements for > installation instructions for certain classes of products. From > section 6 of: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html > === > A ?User Product? is either (1) a ?consumer product?, which means any > tangible personal property which is normally used for personal, > family, or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for > incorporation into a dwelling. In determining whether a product is a > consumer product, doubtful cases shall be resolved in favor of > coverage. For a particular product received by a particular user, > ?normally used? refers to a typical or common use of that class of > product, regardless of the status of the particular user or of the way > in which the particular user actually uses, or expects or is expected > to use, the product. A product is a consumer product regardless of > whether the product has substantial commercial, industrial or > non-consumer uses, unless such uses represent the only significant > mode of use of the product. > > ?Installation Information? for a User Product means any methods, > procedures, authorization keys, or other information required to > install and execute modified versions of a covered work in that User > Product from a modified version of its Corresponding Source. The > information must suffice to ensure that the continued functioning of > the modified object code is in no case prevented or interfered with > solely because modification has been made. > > If you convey an object code work under this section in, or with, or > specifically for use in, a User Product, and the conveying occurs as > part of a transaction in which the right of possession and use of the > User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or for a > fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is characterized), ***** > the Corresponding Source conveyed under this section must be > accompanied by the Installation Information. *** > But this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third > party retains the ability to install modified object code on the User > Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM). > === > > So basically under GPLv3 if a product is sold to consumers and the > firmware is updatable then the end user has to be given all > information required to updated the firmware. So WiFi router, cell > phones, TVs, streaming media devices, etc. if they contain GPLv3 > covered source code must provide installation instructions/keys. Of > course, the Linux kernel is under GPLv2 which doesn't have this > provision. > > Bill Bogstad > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
- Follow-Ups:
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- References:
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: cra at WPI.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: drew.vanzandt at gmail.com (Drew Van Zandt)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: drew.vanzandt at gmail.com (Drew Van Zandt)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: abreauj at gmail.com (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: jabr at blu.org (John Abreau)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: rlk at alum.mit.edu (Robert Krawitz)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: richard.pieri at gmail.com (Rich Pieri)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: mark at buttery.org (Shirley Márquez Dúlcey)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: blu at nedharvey.com (Edward Ned Harvey (blu))
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- From: bogstad at pobox.com (Bill Bogstad)
- [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Prev by Date: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Next by Date: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Previous by thread: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Next by thread: [Discuss] Fwd: Hey FCC, Don't Lock Down Our Wi-Fi Routers | WIRED
- Index(es):